<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LeaderMetrix &#187; Artcles: Advanced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/category/advanced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker</link>
	<description>Author and Speaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 04:34:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>LINGUISTIC COMMUNICATION</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/linguistic-communication-2/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/linguistic-communication-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=2283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>      We have seen that linguists like to think of linguistic items as having fixed and stable properties, among other things inert, literal meanings. This way of looking at linguistic phenomena as objects is coupled with a very popular model of &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>      We have seen that linguists like to think of linguistic items as having fixed and stable properties, among other things inert, literal meanings. This way of looking at linguistic phenomena as objects is coupled with a very popular model of &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/linguistic-communication-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Deliver an Excellent Speech</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/deliver-excellent-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/deliver-excellent-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=1881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the innovations in technology, including that used in schools today, most students have had the opportunity to view professional speeches, such as those given by the U.S. President. Presidents throughout<br />
 history have given speeches in a similar manner, &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the innovations in technology, including that used in schools today, most students have had the opportunity to view professional speeches, such as those given by the U.S. President. Presidents throughout<br />
 history have given speeches in a similar manner, &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/deliver-excellent-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Rogerian Argument? (Kiefer)</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/rogerian-argument-kiefer/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/rogerian-argument-kiefer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=1878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What is Rogerian Argument? (Kiefer)<br />
Back Back to More Detailed Explanation of Rogerian Argument and Toulmin Analysis</p>
<p>Typically, we think of winners and losers of arguments. Our tradition of argument goes back to classical Greece when speakers tried to sway &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Rogerian Argument? (Kiefer)<br />
Back Back to More Detailed Explanation of Rogerian Argument and Toulmin Analysis</p>
<p>Typically, we think of winners and losers of arguments. Our tradition of argument goes back to classical Greece when speakers tried to sway &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/rogerian-argument-kiefer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Classical Argument</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/classical-argument/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/classical-argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=1875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since rhetors began teaching Greek farmers strategies for appealing their cases to Greek courts in the fifth century B.C., the classical argument has stood as a model for writers who believe their case can be argued logically and plausibly to &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since rhetors began teaching Greek farmers strategies for appealing their cases to Greek courts in the fifth century B.C., the classical argument has stood as a model for writers who believe their case can be argued logically and plausibly to &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/classical-argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linguistic Communication</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/linguistic-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/linguistic-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=1872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Communication as transportation of messages</p>
<p>We have seen that linguists like to think of linguistic items as having fixed and stable properties, among other things inert, literal meanings. This way of looking at linguistic phenomena as objects is coupled with &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Communication as transportation of messages</p>
<p>We have seen that linguists like to think of linguistic items as having fixed and stable properties, among other things inert, literal meanings. This way of looking at linguistic phenomena as objects is coupled with &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/linguistic-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sources of the Written Language Bias in Linguistics</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/sources-written-language-bias-linguistics/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/sources-written-language-bias-linguistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=1870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Sources of the Written Language Bias in Linguistics</p>
<p>    &#8220;European linguistic thought formed and matured over concern with the cadavers of written languages &#8211; almost all its basic categories, its basic approaches and techniques were worked out in the process &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sources of the Written Language Bias in Linguistics</p>
<p>    &#8220;European linguistic thought formed and matured over concern with the cadavers of written languages &#8211; almost all its basic categories, its basic approaches and techniques were worked out in the process &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/sources-written-language-bias-linguistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speech and Writing</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/speech-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/speech-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=1867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Spoken language and speech communication</p>
<p>In a normal speech communication situation, a speaker tries to exert an influence on a listener (or a group of listeners) by making him (or them) perceive, understand, feel or do something particular. The speaker &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoken language and speech communication</p>
<p>In a normal speech communication situation, a speaker tries to exert an influence on a listener (or a group of listeners) by making him (or them) perceive, understand, feel or do something particular. The speaker &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/speech-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the Difference between Speech and Writing?</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/difference-speech-writing/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/difference-speech-writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=1865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When we talk about &#8216;language&#8217;, sometimes we mean speech (spoken language), sometimes writing (written language). How are they different? Of course, speech is spoken and heard, while writing is written and read. But there are many other differences:</p>
<p>Age. Speech &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we talk about &#8216;language&#8217;, sometimes we mean speech (spoken language), sometimes writing (written language). How are they different? Of course, speech is spoken and heard, while writing is written and read. But there are many other differences:</p>
<p>Age. Speech &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/difference-speech-writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speech and Writing According to Hegel</title>
		<link>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/speech-writing-hegel/</link>
		<comments>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/speech-writing-hegel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artcles: Advanced]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leadermetrix.com/?p=1863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since real difference belongs to the extremes, this mean (Mitte) is but an abstract neutrality, their real possibility, the as it were theoretical element of the existence, process, and results of chemical objects. In the corporeal element water has this &#8230;</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since real difference belongs to the extremes, this mean (Mitte) is but an abstract neutrality, their real possibility, the as it were theoretical element of the existence, process, and results of chemical objects. In the corporeal element water has this &hellip;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://leadermetrix.com/authorspeaker/speech-writing-hegel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
